The Social Market Foundation has warned of “institutional snobbery” against vocational exams.
It reported that half of white working-class students in England have vocational qualifications as well as A-levels, while in the North East 35% have entered with only vocational exams.
The think tank called for more recognition of how exams other than A-levels are used to get into university, particularly by poorer students.
The research highlighted how vocational qualifications are used for university applications – with about a fifth of places being awarded entirely on the basis of vocational exams.
Young people from ethnic minorities are also disproportionately likely to apply to university with vocational qualifications, such as BTecs.
Children from poorer families are twice as likely to apply to university with vocational qualifications than the children of professional families. There is also a regional difference, with fewer people in the South applying with vocational qualifications.
The think tank said this social divide produces an unhelpful bias in the system – with A-levels dominating political debate about university entry.
“For too long, politicians and the media alike have ignored and even belittled the vocational route, because politics and the media are dominated by people who took the traditional route of A-levels then university,” said James Kirkup, director of the Social Market Foundation.
“Most of the people who run the country didn’t do BTecs, and they don’t come from the sort of background where BTecs matter most. The result is institutional snobbery against vocational qualifications and the people who have them.”
Maddalaine Ansell, chief executive of the University Alliance group of universities, said there had to be support for vocational alternatives to A-levels as a route into higher education – so they did not “end up being dead-ends”.